Mixed Messages On Raising Children Plunge Parents Into Confidence Crisis; Poll Reveals Confusion Over What Is 'Right' and 'Wrong'
Sunday Herald › October 25, 2004
Linked as:
Sunday Herald › October 25, 2004
Linked as:Summary
PARENTS across Scotland are worried they are failing to bring up their children properly after a "confusing" slew of mixed messages from politicians and the media.
As National Parents' Week begins today, a new survey has found that issues such as smacking, truancy and teenage delinquency have divided parents and left them uncertain and confused about the correct way to bring up their children.See the full content of this document
Extract
Mixed Messages On Raising Children Plunge Parents Into Confidence Crisis; Poll Reveals Confusion Over What Is 'Right' and 'Wrong'
More than half of all Scots believe too much emphasis is placed on telling parents what they are doing wrong and not enough on supporting, rewarding and celebrating families.
The study, funded by the Scottish Executive, has discovered almost a quarter of Scots parents worry "all the time" about whether or no...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United Kingdom
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
Your Stars | Gough, Pauline Mary | Whitelock Danielle Lisa | locke ready for challenge after joining new team cycling | United States of America Plaintiff-Appellee v Levon Bazemore Freddie Hull Jr. Defendants-Appellants. 41 F.3d 1431 11th Cir 1994 | 77 Empl Prac Dec P 45,442 48 Fed R Evid Serv 1071 Frank Kasper Plaintiff-Appellee v Saint Mary of Nazareth Hospital Defendant-Appellant. 135 F.3d 1170 7th Cir... | in Re: Luisa v. Anes; in Re: Robert Tierney and Beverly Tierney, Debtors Luisa v. Anes; Robert Tierney and Beverly Tierney, Appellants v. Charles J. D... | Kasinowitz v. United States. Steinberg v. United States. Dobbs v. United States., 181 F.2d 632 (9th Cir. 1950)